The shape of the returns sorts the clocks
This wiki holds year-by-year returns for about 300 companies. Lay those numbers out by chain layer and read them at one moment, and even under the single word "AI" some layers have clearly passed their peak while others are just starting up. Set broker targets aside, and the returns and the chain position alone already separate what is early from what is late.
The reading rule is the one set in Many clocks: gains propagate along the chain with a lag from layer to layer. That narrows the judgment to two axes. A layer whose clock has not started still has room, and a layer that ran hardest carries the give-back. What follows sorts the chain along those two axes.
Clocks that haven't run, part one: the power execution layer
As The next bottleneck is power argued, power runs on the slower clock of plant permits and grid construction. In 2026, data-center site and interconnection operator Equinix gained 34.3% through October 30 as Q3 annualized gross bookings grew 35%. Caterpillar, in generation, slowed to +10.5% after gaining 60.3% in 2025, even as Q3 Power Generation application sales rose 30% to $3.421 billion. GnCenergy also disclosed KRW 2.9544 billion of Caterpillar engine purchases in 2025 and separate ten-set and three-set project references. Buyer procurement and installed units are not Caterpillar consolidated revenue. Demand transmitted from site operations into generator supply, but the stocks did not move at the same speed.
The layer still needs a distinction. The small modular reactors that ran on pre-commercial expectation (Oklo -27% in 2026, NuScale -31%) and the transformers already past their peak (HD Hyundai Electric decelerating from 300% through 120% to +7%) are in a different phase. The principle that only physical capacity turning into revenue keeps rising holds inside the layer too.
Clocks that haven't run, part two: humanoid parts and the compute follower
The earliest case in Frontiers rerate infrastructure before application is humanoids. Harmonic Drive, in joint reducers, was down -24% in 2025 and then started up +161% in 2026, with servo maker Yaskawa at +53%. The application side that builds the robots (Tesla -12%, UBTech -22%) is still held down. The infrastructure-first grammar is intact.
The compute layer has a follower clock too. While NVIDIA cooled from +171% in 2024 to +5% in 2026, AMD accelerated from -18% through +77% to +142% in 2026. The number-two in the same bottleneck layer is turning late, in the space the leader's cooling left open.
Even within that layer, a new listing and a scarce supplier ran on different clocks. Cerebras grew Q2 revenue 74% but fell 68.8% from its first-day close through November 2. Sole foundry TSMC gained 50.3% through October 9. Even with 750MW committed by OpenAI, the systems-and-cloud company carrying data-center execution and customer concentration was repriced before the leading-edge supplier.
Clocks that ran hardest, part one: substrates and packaging
The 2026 explosion flagged by The bottleneck moved from silicon to the package concentrated in a single year. Samsung Electro-Mechanics rose +613% in 2026, AT&S +432%, ASE +160% and Ibiden +184%. The heat piled into the last cell of the chain's propagation.
That concentration is itself the caution signal. The principle left by The memory supercycle, that what rises fastest gives back fastest, weighs most heavily on this layer right now. Samsung Electro-Mechanics at +613% in one year is the extreme case.
Clocks that ran hardest, part two: the funding side cools first
Memory has passed its extreme as well. Kioxia printed +1,082% in 2025 and then +290% in 2026, while Nanya decelerated from +985% to +25%. The heat of the peak is leaking out.
The earlier signal sits at the demand end. As seen in Circular AI financing, this chain cools from the seller's side first. Microsoft, on the funding side, was -19% in 2026 and Oracle -28%, while Nebius, which takes that money and spends it, was still hot at +158%. If the payers cool first and the recipients later, that too is propagation with a lag, downward this time. It is the line that puts the whole AI demand chain on watch.
Listed alternatives managers send the same warning. Ares grew Q2 2026 AUM and fee-paying AUM by 17% and raised a record $36.4 billion, yet its shares fell 25.0% through October 9. KKR (-32.0% through October 9) and Blackstone (-21.6% through October 28) moved the same way. BlackRock, diversified across ETFs, cash management and Aladdin, instead reached $15.49 trillion of AUM and stayed positive at 2.8% in 2026. Even among infrastructure funders, private-credit concentration and revenue mix changed the size of the rates and valuation shock.
The same capital provider also appears in life sciences. Blackstone owns rights to 50% of future Alnylam Leqvio royalties. Novartis Q3 2026 Leqvio sales rose 64% to $506 million, and Alnylam total royalties in the same quarter rose 105% to $94.664 million, primarily on higher Leqvio volume and rate. Yet Alnylam shares were down 59.1% through November 5 and Blackstone 21.6% through October 28. Total royalties cannot be treated as Leqvio-only revenue, and nine-month liability payments cannot be converted into Blackstone's quarterly cash receipts. Sales, rights ownership and equity prices moved on different clocks. The Alnylam Q3 10-Q and Novartis Q3 report define the comparison.
Clocks outside the chain
Mitsubishi Corporation gained 40.8% through October 27, 2026, while strategic holding Mitsubishi Motors was down 4.3% on the same date. That is weak evidence for an auto-demand wave reaching the trading house. On October 21 Mitsubishi and Hudbay approved the Copper World mine. Expected cumulative investment for Mitsubishi’s 30% stake is $1.023 billion, but the project-wide target of roughly 100,000 tonnes of annual copper starts only after first production planned for H2 2029. The shares moved before mine cash flow.
Even within the same automotive chain, Nissan was down 32.8% through October 27, 2026, versus Mitsubishi Motors at -4.3%. Nissan FY2026 Q1 operating profit recovered to JPY77.9 billion from a loss a year earlier, while Mitsubishi European retail volume fell from 15,000 to 9,000. The contract value of Renault’s four OEM models for Mitsubishi is undisclosed. An equity or supply relationship is observable; propagation into automaker demand and shareholder returns still requires separate evidence. The Mitsubishi quarterly data and Nissan release set the next comparison.
### The auto and defense clock can move the business boundary
K2 export expectations lifted Hyundai Rotem 108.8% in 2024 and 290.1% in 2025; main-gun supplier Hyundai Wia followed with a 104.9% gain in 2025. Wia fell 33.8% through 30 October 2026 even as Q3 thermal-management revenue rose 160%. Its mobility operating margin remained only 1.8%. On 19 October Wia agreed to sell its defense division to Rotem for KRW 358.386bn. The unit had KRW 393.1bn of 2025 sales. Wia's K2 supply edge remains valid until the planned March 2027 closing, after which production would move inside Rotem. Earlier supplier returns therefore cannot simply be extended into future external supply revenue. The November shareholder vote and actual closing are the next observations.
The map's boundary shows up in the same returns. Pure defensives with virtually no AI exposure drew money instead in 2026 as AI cooled: Coca-Cola +22%, Nestlé +20%, P&G +7%. Discretionary consumption fell on its own clock the other way. Nike, on weak Greater China sales and inventory correction, was -30% in 2026, moving opposite the rising chain.
Adoption does not change the clock either. Walmart and Starbucks run workflows on Azure and Gemini, but that is a tool to cut costs and is different from demand that lifts revenue. The AI money does not spread outside the chain confirms the boundary across more than twelve controls. Even full dependence on the cloud does not change the clock: Netflix, Airbnb and Disney run on AWS yet move on subscription, travel and content demand. How this map of consumption fans out from defensive through discretionary to luxury is detailed in Consumption does not run on one clock. This layer shows where the phrase "AI beneficiary" stops.
Retail rents run on a separate clock too. Simon rose 95.7% in 2021, ahead of tenants TJX (+12.8%) and Ross (-6.0%), but its 2025 gain of 12.9% lagged their 28.7% and 20.4%. In 2026 Simon gained 11.4% through October 9 while TJX fell 13.2% and Ross rose 28.6% through September 4. Different return cutoffs and undisclosed bilateral rent prevent a direct translation from tenant shares to Simon revenue.
Korea and Asia consumption run on their own clocks too. Amorepacific tracks China's consumption recovery, falling three years running through 2021-2023 on the content ban and China's slowdown before rebounding on US K-beauty. Orion runs on the overseas volumes of China, Vietnam and Russia, up double digits three straight years in 2024-2026 and clearing its first KRW 500B operating profit. CJ CheilJedang, a supposed defensive, instead fell nearly every year on grain and raw-sugar costs, weak domestic demand and heavy debt. The exception is SK Telecom: a carrier that stacked an AI-infrastructure story (GPUaaS, AI data centers, an SK hynix HBM alliance) and re-rated +37.5% in 2025 despite a SIM-hack, the one name in the consumer batch to catch the AI clock.
The boundary does not end at consumption. Even the capital that funds the boom sits outside the chain. JPMorgan, the largest arranger of data-center debt, booked $95.4B of net interest income through 2026, but what lifted its stock was rates, not AI (the +44% of 2024 and +37% of 2025 were the deposit-margin spread of higher-for-longer). Bank of America moves on the same rate beta (-24% in 2022, +34% in 2024). At the opposite extreme sits Berkshire, which instead of buying chips parks $397.4B of cash in short-term Treasuries and waits, earning T-bill yields (+0.3% in 2026). The sharpest paradox is BlackRock: even as it supplies capital directly to AI data centers with Microsoft and NVIDIA through AIP, its stock returned just +6.6% in 2025, far behind the banks. To the sellers AI is revenue, to the users a cost, to the funders a rate clock. The one funding the boom does not capture it in its share price.
### Standby power's operating clock lagged the stock
Cummins gained about 49% in both 2024 and 2025, then slowed to -0.1% through October 30, 2026. Q2 Power Systems sales rose 19% to $2.3 billion at a 24.5% EBITDA margin; Q3 results are due November 5 and are not estimated here. Caterpillar was +10.5% on the same date while Q3 Power Generation application sales rose 30% to $3.421 billion. GnCenergy’s buyer-side 2025 engine purchases were KRW 34.8108 billion from Cummins and KRW 2.9544 billion from Caterpillar. Both suppliers received operating demand, but their stocks diverged with different degrees of 2024-2025 anticipation and different business mixes.
### A media takeover produces a different price signal
Skydance (SKYD) was down 46.4% through October 20, 2026. UFC rights seller TKO was down 10.3% through September 4, while cash takeover target WBD rose 262% through October 5. The dates differ, so these are not precise relative returns. But WBD was delisted after the October 6 close: its rise was convergence on a fixed cash consideration, not proof that content demand propagated along a supply chain. Whether Skydance can recover its average $1.1 billion annual UFC rights payment from Paramount+ subscriptions and post-merger cash flow needs the first combined results.
E-mart gained 44.7% in 2025 and was down 17.1% through October 20, 2026. Its U.S. subsidiary’s disclosed $1 billion buys 100% of a Cayman investment vehicle. That percentage is not Skydance ownership, and the ultimate share count has not been disclosed. Shinsegae Hwaseong’s Paramount theme-park licence dates to a separate 2024 contract. This investment alone does not establish Warner IP rights or incremental E-mart store revenue.
### Automakers and materials traders have different clocks
Toyota Motor gained 21.8% in 2025 and fell 8.5% through October 23, 2026. Across the same periods Toyota Tsusho returned +119.8% and +31.4%, while copper-foil maker SKC returned -25.4% and -29.8%. These observations do not show share-price gains moving in sequence from automaker demand to the trader and then the foil supplier.
Toyota Tsusho's FY2026 annual securities report separately reports JPY 2.316tn of recognized revenue from the Toyota Motor Corporation Group, 20.0% of total sales, and JPY 2.247tn of related-party automobile purchases from that group. The two measures have different accounting bases and neither is attributable to Toyota Motor alone. Toyota Tsusho also operates African vehicle distribution and metal recycling. SKC's Q2 2026 release recorded a quarterly high of KRW 254bn in copper-foil revenue but still reported an operating loss. Asahi Kasei separator deliveries to Toyota Tsusho are scheduled for mid-2027. Supplier-side catch-up remains a hypothesis; the present return gap cannot be converted directly into booked orders or realized profit.
Wells Fargo and Fiserv show a separate bank-and-payments clock. Wells Fargo gained 46.5% in 2024 and 35.6% in 2025, while Fiserv fell 67.3% in 2025. Wells Fargo Q3 average loans and deposits each grew 11%; Fiserv H1 revenue declined 3%. Bank growth alone does not establish a rebound for its processing supplier. The 2026 returns also have different observation dates: Wells Fargo was -10.1% through October 23, while Fiserv was -21.1% through September 4.
Verdict
Read from facts alone, the chain splits into two groups. The power execution layer and humanoid parts are early clocks still rising in 2026; substrates and memory are late clocks that already ran. The slowdown at the funding side is a leading warning laid over the top.
Where this reading diverges from broker consensus is the interesting part. Sell-side sees Korean battery materials (EcoPro BM, L&F) as high-upside buys, but the returns show they are still falling in 2026, at -46% and -16%. Buying the bottom and waiting for a clock that has not arrived collide on the same names. On the other side, Iridium after a +212% run and Samsung Electro-Mechanics at +613% face give-back, and here the consensus caution and the returns point the same way. The map neither buys nor sells. It shows which clocks have not run and which are done.
### Medical-device demand returned, but suppliers did not move at the same speed
Olympus rebounded 14.2% in 2026 after falling 21.4% in 2025, while FY2027 Q1 revenue grew 16.4%. Canon gained only 2.4% in 2026 and DuPont 10.5%. Hospital equipment demand reached imaging systems and sterile-packaging suppliers at different speeds. Olympus is both a recovery case on the off-chain medical-device clock and a reminder that a verified supply link does not synchronize equity timing.
### Home centers and their tool supplier followed different clocks
In 2021 Home Depot (+59.5%) and Lowe’s (+63.3%) rose ahead of supplier Masco (+29.6%). In 2022 Masco fell 32.1%, more than the retailers’ declines of 22.0% and 21.5%. The order reversed by October 21, 2026: Masco was up 19.1% and Stanley Black & Decker 31.4%, while Home Depot was down 6.7% and Lowe’s down 17.2%.
The share-price order is different from the sales order. Home Depot fiscal Q2 2026 sales rose 5.7%, but comparable sales grew 1.7%. Lowe’s total sales rose 8.3%, yet comps grew only 0.2%. In the same calendar quarter Masco sales fell 3% as North American volume weakened; Stanley Black & Decker sales were nearly flat. Masco’s $2.9 billion of sales to Home Depot is an FY2025 annual figure. Ferguson and Lowe’s each represented less than 10% of Masco sales, and 2026 customer-level sales remain undisclosed. To connect the supplier-share rebound with higher retailer procurement, North American volume and retailer comps need to improve together. Masco’s Q2 10-Q and FY2025 10-K set the baseline.
### Travel demand and platform commissions diverged
Trip.com gained 95.8% in 2024, lost 12.2% in 2025 and was down 34.7% through October 23, 2026. Q2 2026 net revenue rose 6%, but a RMB5.2bn Chinese antitrust charge drove a RMB2.4bn net loss. Booking revenue rose 8.1% and Expedia revenue 14% in the same quarter. Bookings can continue while platform terms and regulatory costs change shareholder economics. H World paid Trip.com RMB182m of commissions in 2025, down from RMB283m in 2024, even as Trip.com's aggregate accommodation revenue rose 21%. The travel-platform analysis traces the difference to the filings.